MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs Ryzen 5 8640HS
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 8640HS outperforms MediaTek Kompanio 520 by a whopping 536% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 8640HS and MediaTek Kompanio 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 603 | 1923 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | MediaTek Kompanio 500 |
| Power efficiency | 42.79 | 0.09 |
| Architecture codename | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | 2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55 |
| Release date | 6 December 2023 (less than a year ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 8640HS and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.9 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 25,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 8640HS and MediaTek Kompanio 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP8 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 2000 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8640HS and MediaTek Kompanio 520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8640HS and MediaTek Kompanio 520 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8640HS and MediaTek Kompanio 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 760M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8640HS and MediaTek Kompanio 520.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.66 | 1.99 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 2000 Watt |
Ryzen 5 8640HS has a 536.2% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more threads, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 7042.9% lower power consumption.
MediaTek Kompanio 520, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores.
The Ryzen 5 8640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the MediaTek Kompanio 520 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8640HS and MediaTek Kompanio 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
