Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Ryzen 5 8600G
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 8600G by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E5-2699A v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 425 | 404 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 50.50 | 2.32 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon E5 |
| Power efficiency | 23.24 | 10.74 |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix (2023−2024) | Broadwell-EP (2016) |
| Release date | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | 25 October 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $4,938 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 5 8600G has 2077% better value for money than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E5-2699A v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 22 (Docosa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 44 |
| Base clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | QPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 2 × 9.6 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 24 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 55 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 456.12 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 25,000 million | 7,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E5-2699A v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | AM5 | FCLGA2011 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 145 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E5-2699A v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 46 Bit |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E5-2699A v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E5-2699A v4 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E5-2699A v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.5 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 76.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 760M | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E5-2699A v4.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 40 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.96 | 16.45 |
| Recency | 8 January 2024 | 25 October 2016 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 22 |
| Threads | 12 | 44 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 145 Watt |
Ryzen 5 8600G has an age advantage of 7 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 123.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-2699A v4, on the other hand, has a 3.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 266.7% more physical cores and 266.7% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Note that Ryzen 5 8600G is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2699A v4 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E5-2699A v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
