Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Ryzen 5 8600G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 8600G
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
16.40
+224%

Ryzen 5 8600G outperforms Xeon E3-1285 v4 by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E3-1285 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4081205
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenamePhoenix (2023−2024)Broadwell-DT (2015)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)2 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E3-1285 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed4.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size178 mm2160 mm2
Number of transistors25,000 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E3-1285 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E3-1285 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
eDRAMno data128 MB
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
FDIno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E3-1285 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E3-1285 v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E3-1285 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 760MIntel Iris Pro P6300
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.15 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E3-1285 v4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E3-1285 v4.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 8600G 16.40
+224%
Xeon E3-1285 v4 5.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 8600G 25294
+224%
Xeon E3-1285 v4 7808

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.40 5.06
Recency 8 January 2024 2 June 2015
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 5 8600G has a 224.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 8600G is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1285 v4 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 8600G is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1285 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8600G and Xeon E3-1285 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
Ryzen 5 8600G
Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4
Xeon E3-1285 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 222 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1285 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 8600G or Xeon E3-1285 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.