EPYC 7373X vs Ryzen 5 8500G

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 8500G and EPYC 7373X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking547not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency19.95no data
Architecture codenamePhoenix2 (2024)Milan-X (2022)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 8500G and EPYC 7373X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.05 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm7 nm
Die size137 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors20,900 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 8500G and EPYC 7373X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM5SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and EPYC 7373X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and EPYC 7373X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and EPYC 7373X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-3200

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 740Mno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and EPYC 7373X.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes14128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2024 22 March 2022
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 12 32
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 240 Watt

Ryzen 5 8500G has an age advantage of 1 year, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 269.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7373X, on the other hand, has 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 8500G and EPYC 7373X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 8500G is a notebook processor while EPYC 7373X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8500G and EPYC 7373X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 8500G
Ryzen 5 8500G
AMD EPYC 7373X
EPYC 7373X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 253 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8500G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7373X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 8500G or EPYC 7373X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.