Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Ryzen 5 7645HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 7645HX
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
17.37
+46.2%

Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 7645HX and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking339610
Place by popularitynot in top-10061
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Architecture codenameDragon Range (Zen4)Rembrandt-R
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 7645HX and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4.55 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm6 nm
Die size71 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistors6570 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 7645HX and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFL1FP7
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7645HX and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7645HX and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7645HX and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200DDR5-4800

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 610MAMD Radeon 660M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7645HX and Ryzen 5 7535HS.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes2820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 7645HX 17.37
+46.2%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 11.88

Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 7645HX 26868
+46.2%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 18372

Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 46% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 7645HX 2678
+54.1%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 1738

Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 54% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 7645HX 11781
+73.1%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6805

Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 73% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 7645HX 7717
+23.3%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6257

Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 23% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 7645HX 44716
+19.8%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 37321

Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 20% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 7645HX 26
+27.5%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 20

Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 28% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 7645HX 2276
+29.5%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 1757

Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 30% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 7645HX 289
+19.9%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 241

Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 20% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 7645HX 12.6
+23.5%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 10.2

Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 24% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 7645HX 13352
+103%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6586

Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 103% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 7645HX 136
+30.9%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 104

Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 31% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 7645HX 328
+27.2%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 258

Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by 27% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.37 11.88
Integrated graphics card 2.86 9.78
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 5 7645HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7535HS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7645HX and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
Ryzen 5 7645HX
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 46 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7645HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 857 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 7645HX or Ryzen 5 7535HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.