5 220H vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 7640HS and Core 5 220H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 493 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 39.45 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| Release date | January 2023 (1 year ago) | 18 December 2024 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $342 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 7640HS and Core 5 220H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 25,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 7640HS and Core 5 220H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP8 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7640HS and Core 5 220H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 7640HS and Core 5 220H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7640HS and Core 5 220H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7640HS and Core 5 220H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7640HS and Core 5 220H.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 6 | 12 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7640HS has a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.
5 220H, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 7640HS and Core 5 220H. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7640HS and Core 5 220H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
