Opteron 6220 vs Ryzen 5 7600X3D
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 7600X3D outperforms Opteron 6220 by a whopping 442% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 551 | 1908 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 41.27 | 0.21 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 24.07 | 2.51 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2025) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 30 August 2024 (1 year ago) | 14 November 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $523 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 5 7600X3D has 19552% better value for money than Opteron 6220.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Opteron 6220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 96 MB (shared) | 8 MB (per die) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 71 mm2 | 2x 315 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 61 °C | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | 11,270 million | 2,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Opteron 6220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 4 |
| Socket | AM5 | G34 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 115 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Opteron 6220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Opteron 6220 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Opteron 6220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7600X3D and Opteron 6220.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.57 | 2.69 |
| Recency | 30 August 2024 | 14 November 2011 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 115 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7600X3D has a 441.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 50% more threads, a 540% more advanced lithography process, and 76.9% lower power consumption.
Opteron 6220, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores.
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 6220 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 7600X3D is a desktop processor while Opteron 6220 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
