Ultra 9 185H vs Ryzen 5 7535H
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 7535H and Core Ultra 9 185H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 324 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Meteor Lake-H |
| Power efficiency | no data | 38.90 |
| Architecture codename | Rembrandt-R (2023) | Meteor Lake-H (2023) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $640 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 7535H and Core Ultra 9 185H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 22 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.55 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 208 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 110 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 7535H and Core Ultra 9 185H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP7 | Intel BGA 2049 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7535H and Core Ultra 9 185H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 7535H and Core Ultra 9 185H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7535H and Core Ultra 9 185H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7535H and Core Ultra 9 185H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon 660M | Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2350 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7535H and Core Ultra 9 185H.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 16.31 | 18.48 |
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 16 |
| Threads | 12 | 22 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7535H has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.
Ultra 9 185H, on the other hand, has 13.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 months, and 166.7% more physical cores and 83.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 7535H and Core Ultra 9 185H. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7535H and Core Ultra 9 185H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
