Celeron P4500 vs Ryzen 5 7530U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 7530U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
10.46
+1802%

Ryzen 5 7530U outperforms Celeron P4500 by a whopping 1802% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron P4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7642838
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency63.591.43
Architecture codenameBarcelo-U Refresh (2023)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)28 March 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron P4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data14
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography7 nm32 nm
Die size180 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C90 °C
Number of transistors10,700 million382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron P4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP6PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron P4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI+-
FMA++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron P4500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron P4500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron P4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 7Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron P4500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron P4500.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 7530U 10.46
+1802%
Celeron P4500 0.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 7530U 16012
+1788%
Celeron P4500 848

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.46 0.55
Recency 4 January 2023 28 March 2010
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 7530U has a 1801.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7530U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron P4500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron P4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 7530U
Ryzen 5 7530U
Intel Celeron P4500
Celeron P4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 630 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7530U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 8 votes

Rate Celeron P4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 7530U or Celeron P4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.