i7-4940MX Extreme Edition vs Ryzen 5 7520U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 7520U and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1118 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 27 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) | Intel Core i7EE |
| Power efficiency | 36.47 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| Release date | 20 September 2022 (2 years ago) | 19 January 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 7520U and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI |
| Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 31 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 100 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 7520U and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP6 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 57 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7520U and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 7520U and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7520U and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7520U and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7520U and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 September 2022 | 19 January 2014 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 57 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7520U has an age advantage of 8 years, a 266.7% more advanced lithography process, and 280% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 7520U and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7520U and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
