EPYC 7203P vs Ryzen 5 7500F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 7500F and EPYC 7203P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking370not rated
Place by popularity20not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameRaphael (2023−2024)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date22 July 2023 (1 year ago)5 September 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 7500F and EPYC 7203P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm7 nm
Die size71 mm22x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)61 °Cno data
Number of transistors6,570 million8,300 million
64 bit support+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 7500F and EPYC 7203P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7500F and EPYC 7203P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7500F and EPYC 7203P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7500F and EPYC 7203P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7500F and EPYC 7203P.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes24128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2023 5 September 2023
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 120 Watt

Ryzen 5 7500F has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 84.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7203P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 7500F and EPYC 7203P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 7500F is a desktop processor while EPYC 7203P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7500F and EPYC 7203P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Ryzen 5 7500F
AMD EPYC 7203P
EPYC 7203P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2448 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7500F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7203P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 7500F or EPYC 7203P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.