EPYC 4465P vs Ryzen 5 7400F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 7400F
2025
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
15.96
EPYC 4465P
2025
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
31.40
+96.7%

EPYC 4465P outperforms Ryzen 5 7400F by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking492169
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation52.3175.43
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency9.4918.68
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameRaphael (2023−2025)Grado (2025)
Release date9 January 2025 (less than a year ago)13 May 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4465P has 44% better value for money than Ryzen 5 7400F.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 7400F and EPYC 4465P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1224
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size71 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)61 °Cno data
Number of transistors6,570 million16,630 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 7400F and EPYC 4465P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7400F and EPYC 4465P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7400F and EPYC 4465P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7400F and EPYC 4465P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7400F and EPYC 4465P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes2424

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 7400F 15.96
EPYC 4465P 31.40
+96.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 7400F 25658
EPYC 4465P 50492
+96.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.96 31.40
Recency 9 January 2025 13 May 2025
Physical cores 6 12
Threads 12 24
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm

EPYC 4465P has a 96.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 4465P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 7400F is a desktop processor while EPYC 4465P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 7400F
Ryzen 5 7400F
AMD EPYC 4465P
EPYC 4465P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 100 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4465P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 7400F and EPYC 4465P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.