Ryzen 7 7730U vs Ryzen 5 6600HS

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 5 6600HS
2022
6 cores / 12 threads
12.17
+1%
Ryzen 7 7730U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads
12.05

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7730U by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen 5 6600HS and Ryzen 7 7730U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking566573
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Architecture codenameRembrandt-HS (Zen 3+)Barcelo-U Refresh
Release dateJanuary 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Technical specs

Ryzen 5 6600HS and Ryzen 7 7730U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm7 nm
Die size208 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 6600HS and Ryzen 7 7730U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP7FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 6600HS and Ryzen 7 7730U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 6600HS and Ryzen 7 7730U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 6600HS and Ryzen 7 7730U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5, DDR5DDR4, DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 660MAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 6600HS and Ryzen 7 7730U.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 6600HS 12.17
+1%
Ryzen 7 7730U 12.05

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7730U by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 6600HS 18975
+1%
Ryzen 7 7730U 18787

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7730U by 1% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 6600HS 6157
Ryzen 7 7730U 6243
+1.4%

Ryzen 7 7730U outperforms Ryzen 5 6600HS by 1% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 6600HS 34414
+5.3%
Ryzen 7 7730U 32670

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7730U by 5% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 6600HS 19
Ryzen 7 7730U 19
+0.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 6600HS 1656
Ryzen 7 7730U 1830
+10.5%

Ryzen 7 7730U outperforms Ryzen 5 6600HS by 11% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 6600HS 235
+1.7%
Ryzen 7 7730U 231

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7730U by 2% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 6600HS 2.74
Ryzen 7 7730U 2.76
+0.7%

Ryzen 7 7730U outperforms Ryzen 5 6600HS by 1% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 6600HS 7.7
Ryzen 7 7730U 10.1
+31.2%

Ryzen 7 7730U outperforms Ryzen 5 6600HS by 31% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 6600HS 5207
Ryzen 7 7730U 5881
+12.9%

Ryzen 7 7730U outperforms Ryzen 5 6600HS by 13% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 6600HS 237
+0.1%
Ryzen 7 7730U 236

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 6600HS 93
+2.8%
Ryzen 7 7730U 91

Ryzen 5 6600HS outperforms Ryzen 7 7730U by 3% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 12.17 12.05
Integrated graphics card 9.79 9.06
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 6 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 6600HS and Ryzen 7 7730U. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 6600HS and Ryzen 7 7730U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS
Ryzen 5 6600HS
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
Ryzen 7 7730U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 54 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 6600HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 595 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7730U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 6600HS or Ryzen 7 7730U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.