FX-8350 vs Ryzen 5 5500GT
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 5500GT outperforms FX-8350 by a whopping 241% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 5500GT and FX-8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 628 | 1524 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 70.29 | 0.89 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD FX-Series (Desktop) |
| Power efficiency | 18.52 | 2.82 |
| Architecture codename | Cezanne (2021−2024) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| Release date | 8 January 2024 (1 year ago) | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | $199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 5 5500GT has 7798% better value for money than FX-8350.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 5500GT and FX-8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 8192 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 61 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,700 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 5500GT and FX-8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and FX-8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and FX-8350 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and FX-8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and FX-8350.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | n/a |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 12.65 | 3.71 |
| Recency | 8 January 2024 | 23 October 2012 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Ryzen 5 5500GT has a 241% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 50% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.
FX-8350, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores.
The Ryzen 5 5500GT is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8350 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
