Xeon Gold 6438Y+ vs Ryzen 5 5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 5500
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.93
Xeon Gold 6438Y+
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
35.46
+224%

Xeon Gold 6438Y+ outperforms Ryzen 5 5500 by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking800111
Place by popularity1not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.9911.26
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency7.167.36
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameCezanne (2021−2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date4 April 2022 (3 years ago)10 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159$3,141

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 5500 has 335% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6438Y+.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 5500 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1264
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB60 MB
Chip lithography7 nm10 nm
Die size180 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °C85 °C
Number of transistors10,700 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 5500 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM44677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 5500 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 5500 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 5500 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 5500 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 5500 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 5500 10.93
Xeon Gold 6438Y+ 35.46
+224%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 5500 19314
Samples: 9194
Xeon Gold 6438Y+ 62660
+224%
Samples: 2

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 5500 1873
+37.9%
Xeon Gold 6438Y+ 1358

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 5500 7664
Xeon Gold 6438Y+ 12068
+57.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.93 35.46
Recency 4 April 2022 10 January 2023
Physical cores 6 32
Threads 12 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 205 Watt

Ryzen 5 5500 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 215.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6438Y+, on the other hand, has a 224.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6438Y+ is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 5500 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6438Y+ is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 5500
Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Xeon Gold 6438Y+
Xeon Gold 6438Y+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 12432 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6438Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 5500 and Xeon Gold 6438Y+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.