Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Ryzen 5 4600H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 4600H
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
8.04
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
35.31
+339%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 5 4600H by a whopping 339% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1045117
Place by popularity79not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency7.595.36
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameRenoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date6 January 2020 (5 years ago)14 July 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 4600H and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1264
Base clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplier3035
L1 cache384 KB2 MB
L2 cache3 MB16 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)128 MB
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size156 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors9800 Million23540 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 4600H and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 4600H and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 4600H and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 4600H and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/s204.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 4600H and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 4600H 8.04
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 35.31
+339%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 4600H 14179
Samples: 3283
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 62261
+339%
Samples: 194

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 4600H 1384
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 1647
+19%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 4600H 5205
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 14836
+185%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 5 4600H 5365
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 5884
+9.7%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 5 4600H 32756
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 53924
+64.6%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 5 4600H 16
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 52
+221%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 4600H 1425
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 7053
+395%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 4600H 176
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 201
+14.2%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 4600H 2.04
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 2.19
+7.4%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 5 4600H 5
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 27
+440%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 5 4600H 4380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 6530
+49.1%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 5 4600H 197
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 268
+36%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 5 4600H 83
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 193
+133%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 5 4600H 6080
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 28798
+374%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 5 4600H 4397
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 5140
+16.9%

7-Zip

Ryzen 5 4600H 37643
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 141386
+276%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 5 4600H 352
+407%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 69

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 5 4600H 1117
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 1285
+15%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 5 4600H 207
+4.5%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 198

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.04 35.31
Recency 6 January 2020 14 July 2020
Physical cores 6 32
Threads 12 64
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 280 Watt

Ryzen 5 4600H has 522.2% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, on the other hand, has a 339.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 4600H in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 4600H is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
Ryzen 5 4600H
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 285729 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 102 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 4600H and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.