Core i5-1030NG7 vs Ryzen 5 4600H

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 5 4600H
2020
6 cores / 12 threads
9.35
+151%
Core i5-1030NG7
2020
4 cores / 8 threads
3.72

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 151% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen 5 4600H and Core i5-1030NG7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking7351371
Place by popularity78not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Ice Lake
Architecture codenameRenoir-H (Zen 2)Ice Lake Y (2020)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years old)20 March 2020 (4 years old)
Current price$909 no data

Technical specs

Ryzen 5 4600H and Core i5-1030NG7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache11 MB (shared)6 MB
Chip lithography7 nm10 nm
Die size156 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors9800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 4600H and Core i5-1030NG7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6no data
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 4600H and Core i5-1030NG7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
vProno data-
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 4600H and Core i5-1030NG7 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 4600H and Core i5-1030NG7 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 4600H and Core i5-1030NG7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR4LPDDR4-3733
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/s58.3 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 4600H and Core i5-1030NG7 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 5 4600H and Core i5-1030NG7 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno dataYes, at 120Hz
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data5120 x 3200@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 4600H and Core i5-1030NG7 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 4600H and Core i5-1030NG7.

PCIe version3.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 4600H 9.35
+151%
i5-1030NG7 3.72

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 151% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 4600H 14465
+152%
i5-1030NG7 5749

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 152% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 4600H 1357
+5.7%
i5-1030NG7 1284

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 6% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 4600H 5045
+54.1%
i5-1030NG7 3274

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 54% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 4600H 5365
+26.2%
i5-1030NG7 4250

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 26% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 4600H 32756
+247%
i5-1030NG7 9432

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 247% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 4600H 16
+382%
i5-1030NG7 3

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 382% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 4600H 1425
+218%
i5-1030NG7 448

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 218% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 4600H 176
+25.7%
i5-1030NG7 140

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 26% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 4600H 2.04
+68.6%
i5-1030NG7 1.21

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 69% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 4600H 5
+61.3%
i5-1030NG7 3.1

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 61% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 4600H 4380
+12.9%
i5-1030NG7 3878

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 13% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 4600H 197
+155%
i5-1030NG7 77

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 155% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 4600H 83
+391%
i5-1030NG7 17

Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i5-1030NG7 by 391% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 9.35 3.72
Integrated graphics card 6.23
Recency 6 January 2020 20 March 2020
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 10 Watt

The Ryzen 5 4600H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-1030NG7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 4600H and Core i5-1030NG7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
Ryzen 5 4600H
Intel Core i5-1030NG7
Core i5-1030NG7

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 284641 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 4600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 38 votes

Rate Core i5-1030NG7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 4600H or Core i5-1030NG7, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.