Ryzen 7 1700 vs Ryzen 5 4500U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 4500U
2020
6 cores / 6 threads, 25 Watt
7.07
Ryzen 7 1700
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.58
+35.5%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Ryzen 5 4500U by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 4500U and Ryzen 7 1700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking940750
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameRenoir-U (Zen 2)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)2 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329
Current price$527 $212 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 4500U and Ryzen 7 1700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads616
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache11 MB (shared)16384 KB
Chip lithography7 nm14 nm
Die size156 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors9800 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 4500U and Ryzen 7 1700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP6AM4
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Ryzen 7 1700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+FMA3
AVX++
XFRno data-
SenseMIno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Ryzen 7 1700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Ryzen 7 1700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and Ryzen 7 1700.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 4500U 7.07
Ryzen 7 1700 9.58
+35.5%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Ryzen 5 4500U by 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 4500U 10939
Ryzen 7 1700 14810
+35.4%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Ryzen 5 4500U by 35% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 4500U 5337
+20.8%
Ryzen 7 1700 4419

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 21% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 4500U 24156
Ryzen 7 1700 29330
+21.4%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Ryzen 5 4500U by 21% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 4500U 8934
+7.2%
Ryzen 7 1700 8335

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 7% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 5 4500U 8.3
Ryzen 7 1700 6
+38.3%

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 38% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 4500U 11
Ryzen 7 1700 16
+43.9%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Ryzen 5 4500U by 44% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 4500U 892
Ryzen 7 1700 1414
+58.5%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Ryzen 5 4500U by 59% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 4500U 174
+18.4%
Ryzen 7 1700 147

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 18% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 4500U 2.03
+22.3%
Ryzen 7 1700 1.66

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 22% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 4500U 4.9
Ryzen 7 1700 7.2
+46.9%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Ryzen 5 4500U by 47% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 4500U 3493
+1.3%
Ryzen 7 1700 3447

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 1% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 4500U 59
Ryzen 7 1700 74
+25.5%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Ryzen 5 4500U by 25% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 4500U 210
+36.5%
Ryzen 7 1700 154

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 36% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Ryzen 5 4500U 18690
Ryzen 7 1700 23920
+28%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Ryzen 5 4500U by 28% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Ryzen 5 4500U 3960
+18.5%
Ryzen 7 1700 3343

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 18% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Ryzen 5 4500U 14964
Ryzen 7 1700 18461
+23.4%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Ryzen 5 4500U by 23% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.07 9.58
Recency 6 January 2020 2 March 2017
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 6 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 7 1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 4500U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 4500U is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 1700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 4500U and Ryzen 7 1700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Ryzen 5 4500U
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2216 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1451 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 4500U or Ryzen 7 1700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.