A6-7310 vs Ryzen 5 4500U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 4500U
2020
6 cores / 6 threads, 25 Watt
7.07
+306%

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms A6-7310 by a whopping 306% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 4500U and A6-7310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking9301934
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD A-Series
Architecture codenameRenoir-U (Zen 2)Carrizo-L (2015)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)7 May 2015 (9 years ago)
Current price$527 $452

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 4500U and A6-7310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache11 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm28 nm
Die size156 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors9800 Million930 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 4500U and A6-7310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP6FP4
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt12-25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and A6-7310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT
AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data-
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data-
VirusProtectno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and A6-7310 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+1
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and A6-7310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3L-1866
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 4500U and A6-7310 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and A6-7310 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 4500U and A6-7310.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 4500U 7.07
+306%
A6-7310 1.74

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms A6-7310 by 306% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 4500U 10943
+307%
A6-7310 2689

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms A6-7310 by 307% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 4500U 5337
+196%
A6-7310 1801

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms A6-7310 by 196% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 4500U 24156
+376%
A6-7310 5075

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms A6-7310 by 376% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 4500U 11
+448%
A6-7310 2

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms A6-7310 by 448% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 4500U 892
+542%
A6-7310 139

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms A6-7310 by 542% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 4500U 174
+291%
A6-7310 45

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms A6-7310 by 291% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 4500U 2.03
+250%
A6-7310 0.58

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms A6-7310 by 250% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 4500U 4.9
+390%
A6-7310 1

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms A6-7310 by 390% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 4500U 3493
+197%
A6-7310 1176

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms A6-7310 by 197% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 4500U 59
+411%
A6-7310 12

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms A6-7310 by 411% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 4500U 210
+295%
A6-7310 53

Ryzen 5 4500U outperforms A6-7310 by 295% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.07 1.74
Recency 6 January 2020 7 May 2015
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 12 Watt

The Ryzen 5 4500U is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-7310 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 4500U and A6-7310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
Ryzen 5 4500U
AMD A6-7310
A6-7310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2194 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 458 votes

Rate A6-7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 4500U or A6-7310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.