Xeon E5-4669 v3 vs Ryzen 5 3600X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3600X
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
11.45
+4.4%
Xeon E5-4669 v3
2015
18 cores / 36 threads, 135 Watt
10.97

Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E5-4669 v3 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3600X and Xeon E5-4669 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking690715
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.84no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency11.407.69
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3600X and Xeon E5-4669 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads1236
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rateno data9.6 GT/s
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)45 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data356 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data88 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3600X and Xeon E5-4669 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4
SocketAM4FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3600X and Xeon E5-4669 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
PAEno data46 Bit
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 3600X and Xeon E5-4669 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3600X and Xeon E5-4669 v3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3600X and Xeon E5-4669 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB768 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3600X and Xeon E5-4669 v3.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3600X 11.45
+4.4%
Xeon E5-4669 v3 10.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3600X 18184
+4.3%
Xeon E5-4669 v3 17430

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.45 10.97
Recency 7 July 2019 1 June 2015
Physical cores 6 18
Threads 12 36
Chip lithography 7 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 135 Watt

Ryzen 5 3600X has a 4.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 214.3% more advanced lithography process, and 42.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-4669 v3, on the other hand, has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 5 3600X and Xeon E5-4669 v3.

Note that Ryzen 5 3600X is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-4669 v3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3600X and Xeon E5-4669 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Ryzen 5 3600X
Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3
Xeon E5-4669 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2809 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4669 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3600X or Xeon E5-4669 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.