Itanium 9330 vs Ryzen 5 3500X
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1159 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.89 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (2019−2020) | no data |
| Release date | 24 September 2019 (6 years ago) | 1 January 2010 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3500X and Itanium 9330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.46 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 20 MB L3 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 65 nm |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3500X and Itanium 9330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1248 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and Itanium 9330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 1.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 50 Bit |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 3500X and Itanium 9330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and Itanium 9330 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and Itanium 9330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 24 September 2019 | 1 January 2010 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 155 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3500X has an age advantage of 9 years, 50% more physical cores, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 138.5% lower power consumption.
Itanium 9330, on the other hand, has 33.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 5 3500X and Intel Itanium 9330. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 3500X is a desktop processor while Itanium 9330 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
