Core 2 Extreme QX6800 vs Ryzen 5 3500X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 3500X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 903 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 12.06 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (2019−2020) | Kentsfield (2007) |
| Release date | 24 September 2019 (5 years ago) | April 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3500X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 8 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 65 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 582 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3500X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 3500X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 130 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3500X has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 3500X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3500X and Core 2 Extreme QX6800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
