Celeron 927UE vs Ryzen 5 3500X
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1106 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 4.87 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (2019−2020) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 24 September 2019 (6 years ago) | 1 January 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3500X and Celeron 927UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3500X and Celeron 927UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and Celeron 927UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and Celeron 927UE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500X and Celeron 927UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 24 September 2019 | 1 January 2013 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 6 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3500X has an age advantage of 6 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 927UE, on the other hand, has 282.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 5 3500X and Intel Celeron 927UE. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 3500X is a desktop processor while Celeron 927UE is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
