Xeon D-1715TER vs Ryzen 5 3500U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3500U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.54
Xeon D-1715TER
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 50 Watt
5.95
+31.1%

Xeon D-1715TER outperforms Ryzen 5 3500U by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon D-1715TER processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13431120
Place by popularity36not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency27.6010.85
Architecture codenamePicasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)24 February 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon D-1715TER basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)10 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm10 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon D-1715TER compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FCBGA2227
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon D-1715TER. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon D-1715TER technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon D-1715TER are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon D-1715TER. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB384 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon D-1715TER.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1216
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3500U 4.54
Xeon D-1715TER 5.95
+31.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3500U 6941
Xeon D-1715TER 9104
+31.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.54 5.95
Recency 6 January 2019 24 February 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

Ryzen 5 3500U has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-1715TER, on the other hand, has a 31.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon D-1715TER is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3500U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 3500U is a notebook processor while Xeon D-1715TER is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3500U and Xeon D-1715TER, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U
Intel Xeon D-1715TER
Xeon D-1715TER

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8630 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1715TER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3500U or Xeon D-1715TER, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.