Ryzen 7 8700F vs Ryzen 5 3500U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3500U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.36
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
19.53
+348%

Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms Ryzen 5 3500U by a whopping 348% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3500U and Ryzen 7 8700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1359293
Place by popularity32not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.77
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency27.5128.43
Architecture codenamePicasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$270

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3500U and Ryzen 7 8700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm4 nm
Die size209.78 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors4940 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3500U and Ryzen 7 8700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500U and Ryzen 7 8700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3500U and Ryzen 7 8700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500U and Ryzen 7 8700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3500U and Ryzen 7 8700F.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1220

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3500U 4.36
Ryzen 7 8700F 19.53
+348%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3500U 6931
Ryzen 7 8700F 31024
+348%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.36 19.53
Recency 6 January 2019 1 April 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 3500U has 333.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 8700F, on the other hand, has a 347.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 8700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3500U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 3500U is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 8700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3500U and Ryzen 7 8700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8691 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 258 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3500U or Ryzen 7 8700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.