EPYC 9275F vs Ryzen 5 3500U

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3500U and EPYC 9275F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1358not rated
Place by popularity32not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency27.53no data
Architecture codenamePicasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)Turin (2024)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,439

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3500U and EPYC 9275F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm4 nm
Die size209.78 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors4940 Million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3500U and EPYC 9275F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500U and EPYC 9275F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3500U and EPYC 9275F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500U and EPYC 9275F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3500U and EPYC 9275F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 320 Watt

Ryzen 5 3500U has 2033.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9275F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 3500U and EPYC 9275F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 3500U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9275F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3500U and EPYC 9275F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U
AMD EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9275F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8689 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9275F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3500U or EPYC 9275F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.