Pentium E5700 vs Ryzen 5 3500

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3500
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
8.35
+1076%

Ryzen 5 3500 outperforms Pentium E5700 by a whopping 1076% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3500 and Pentium E5700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9262714
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency11.711.00
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)8 August 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$110

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3500 and Pentium E5700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache16 MB0 KB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3500 and Pentium E5700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Pentium E5700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 3500 and Pentium E5700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Pentium E5700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Pentium E5700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Pentium E5700.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3500 8.35
+1076%
Pentium E5700 0.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3500 12785
+1079%
Pentium E5700 1084

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 3500 1514
+369%
Pentium E5700 323

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 3500 5375
+934%
Pentium E5700 520

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.35 0.71
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm

Ryzen 5 3500 has a 1076.1% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E5700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3500 and Pentium E5700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Ryzen 5 3500
Intel Pentium E5700
Pentium E5700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 754 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 937 votes

Rate Pentium E5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3500 or Pentium E5700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.