Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Ryzen 5 3450U
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Ryzen 5 3450U by a whopping 1047% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1635 | 73 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | no data | 16.30 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| Release date | 1 May 2020 (5 years ago) | 8 March 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3450U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 36 |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4500 Million | 16,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3450U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP5 | WRX8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 MB + 4 MB | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz) | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.71 | 42.56 |
| Recency | 1 May 2020 | 8 March 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 32 |
| Threads | 8 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 280 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3450U has 13900% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, on the other hand, has a 1047.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 3450U in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 3450U is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
