Ryzen Threadripper 1940 vs Ryzen 5 3450U
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1570 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 10.56 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 1 May 2020 (5 years ago) | 29 July 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3450U and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 28 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4500 Million | 9,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3450U and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP5 | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 Quad-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2020 | 29 July 2017 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 14 |
| Threads | 8 | 28 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 180 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3450U has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1100% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 1940, on the other hand, has 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 5 3450U and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 3450U is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1940 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
