Atom x3-3205RK vs Ryzen 5 3450U
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1669 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 10.50 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) | Silvermont (2015) |
| Release date | 1 May 2020 (5 years ago) | 2 March 2015 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3450U and Atom x3-3205RK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 56K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4500 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3450U and Atom x3-3205RK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Atom x3-3205RK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 3450U and Atom x3-3205RK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3450U and Atom x3-3205RK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR2, DDR3 1333 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz) | Mali-450 MP4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2020 | 2 March 2015 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 2 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3450U has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
Atom x3-3205RK, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 5 3450U and Intel Atom x3-3205RK. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
