A8-7410 vs Ryzen 5 3400GE

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3400GE
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
5.02
+222%

Ryzen 5 3400GE outperforms A8-7410 by a whopping 222% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13382259
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency6.062.64
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Carrizo-L (2015)
Release date7 July 2019 (6 years ago)7 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3400GE and A8-7410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography12 nm28 nm
Die size210 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors4,940 million930 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3400GE and A8-7410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4FP4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt12 - 25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3400GE and A8-7410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-V
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3400GE and A8-7410 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3400GE and A8-7410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3L-1866
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 3400GE and A8-7410 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 3400GE and A8-7410 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3400GE and A8-7410.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 3400GE 5.02
+222%
A8-7410 1.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3400GE Samples: 41 8825
+222%
A8-7410 Samples: 1395 2741

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.02 1.56
Recency 7 July 2019 7 May 2015
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 12 Watt

Ryzen 5 3400GE has a 221.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

A8-7410, on the other hand, has 191.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A8-7410 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3400GE is a desktop processor while A8-7410 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE
Ryzen 5 3400GE
AMD A8-7410
A8-7410

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 44 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3400GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 754 votes

Rate A8-7410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 3400GE and A8-7410, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.