A10 Pro-7350B vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 3400GE outperforms A10 Pro-7350B by a whopping 362% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 3400GE and A10 Pro-7350B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1143 | 2332 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Kaveri |
| Power efficiency | 15.11 | 6.03 |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| Release date | 7 July 2019 (5 years ago) | 4 June 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3400GE and A10 Pro-7350B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | 245 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | 2410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3400GE and A10 Pro-7350B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | FP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 19 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3400GE and A10 Pro-7350B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | - | + |
| TrueAudio | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| Out-of-band client management | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| RAID | - | + |
| HSA | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3400GE and A10 Pro-7350B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3400GE and A10 Pro-7350B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR3-1600 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 6 |
| Number of pipelines | no data | 384 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 3400GE and A10 Pro-7350B integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen 5 3400GE and A10 Pro-7350B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3400GE and A10 Pro-7350B.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.59 | 1.21 |
| Recency | 7 July 2019 | 4 June 2014 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 19 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3400GE has a 362% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
A10 Pro-7350B, on the other hand, has 84.2% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 3400GE is our recommended choice as it beats the A10 Pro-7350B in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 3400GE is a desktop processor while A10 Pro-7350B is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3400GE and A10 Pro-7350B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
