Xeon W-3265 vs Ryzen 5 3400G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3400G
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.24
Xeon W-3265
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
17.13
+227%

Xeon W-3265 outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G by a whopping 227% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1321407
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.39
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Xeon W
Power efficiency3.413.53
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date7 July 2019 (6 years ago)3 June 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3400G and Xeon W-3265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3727
L1 cache128K (per core)1.5 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)24 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)33 MB
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size210 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
Number of transistors4,950 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3400G and Xeon W-3265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and Xeon W-3265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 3400G and Xeon W-3265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and Xeon W-3265 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and Xeon W-3265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size64 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and Xeon W-3265.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2064

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 3400G 5.24
Xeon W-3265 17.13
+227%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3400G 9204
Samples: 3809
Xeon W-3265 30105
+227%
Samples: 2

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 3400G 1136
Xeon W-3265 1242
+9.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 3400G 3627
Xeon W-3265 12398
+242%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.24 17.13
Recency 7 July 2019 3 June 2019
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 205 Watt

Ryzen 5 3400G has an age advantage of 1 month, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 215.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3265, on the other hand, has a 226.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

The Intel Xeon W-3265 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3400G is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3265 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Ryzen 5 3400G
Intel Xeon W-3265
Xeon W-3265

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 2404 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 11 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 3400G and Xeon W-3265, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.