Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1124 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | 8.43 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 7 July 2019 (5 years ago) | 29 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $329 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 37 | 37 |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | 4800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | Socket AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 46.933 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 July 2019 | 29 April 2019 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 105 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3400G has an age advantage of 2 months, and 61.5% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 7 2700X Gold Edition, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
