Celeron M 370 vs Ryzen 5 3350G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 3350G outperforms Celeron M 370 by a whopping 3521% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1378 | 3597 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Picasso | Celeron M |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3350G and Celeron M 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3350G and Celeron M 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | AM4 | H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and Celeron M 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 3350G and Celeron M 370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and Celeron M 370 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and Celeron M 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.07 | 0.14 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 21 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3350G has a 3521.4% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 370, on the other hand, has 209.5% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 5 3350G is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 370 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 3350G is a desktop processor while Celeron M 370 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
