A12-9800 vs Ryzen 5 3350G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3350G
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.67
+150%
A12-9800
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.27

Ryzen 5 3350G outperforms A12-9800 by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3350G and A12-9800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11461823
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.45
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesPicassono data
Power efficiencyno data3.30
Architecture codenameno dataBristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateno data27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$139

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3350G and A12-9800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.2 GHz
L2 cacheno data2048 KB
L3 cache4096 KB0 KB
Chip lithography12 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3350G and A12-9800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and A12-9800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and A12-9800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and A12-9800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2400
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 3350G and A12-9800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and A12-9800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3350G and A12-9800.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3350G 5.67
+150%
A12-9800 2.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3350G 9000
+149%
A12-9800 3611

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.67 2.27
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm

Ryzen 5 3350G has a 149.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 3350G is our recommended choice as it beats the A12-9800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3350G and A12-9800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3350G
Ryzen 5 3350G
AMD A12-9800
A12-9800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 246 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3350G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 197 votes

Rate A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3350G or A12-9800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.