Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs Ryzen 5 2600X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2600X
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.76
+98.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.42

Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8651329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.20no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency8.7327.89
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)8 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.25 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3621
L1 cache96K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm12 nm
Die size192 mm2209.78 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2600X 8.76
+98.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 4.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2600X 13907
+98.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 7019

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 2600X 1248
+36.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 916

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 2600X 5289
+100%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 2639

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 5 2600X 1341
+115%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 624

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 5 2600X 163
+14.8%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 142

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 5 2600X 6094
+116%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 2824

Blender(-)

Ryzen 5 2600X 352
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 796
+126%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 5 2600X 1145
+32.6%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 863

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 5 2600X 4293
+23.6%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 3474

7-Zip

Ryzen 5 2600X 33222
+105%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 16221

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 5 2600X 186
+31%
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U 142

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.76 4.42
Recency 19 April 2018 8 April 2019
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 2600X has a 98.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 2600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 2600X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Ryzen 5 2600X
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2320 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 142 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600X or Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.