EPYC 7F32 vs Ryzen 5 2600X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2600X
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
9.00
EPYC 7F32
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
15.16
+68.4%

EPYC 7F32 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600X by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2600X and EPYC 7F32 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking797432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.34no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)14 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229$2,100
Current price$151 (0.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600X and EPYC 7F32 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.25 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size209.78 mm274 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600X and EPYC 7F32 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600X and EPYC 7F32. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600X and EPYC 7F32 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600X and EPYC 7F32. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600X and EPYC 7F32.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2600X 9.00
EPYC 7F32 15.16
+68.4%

EPYC 7F32 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600X by 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 2600X 13913
EPYC 7F32 23453
+68.6%

EPYC 7F32 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600X by 69% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.00 15.16
Recency 19 April 2018 14 April 2020
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Cost $229 $2100
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 180 Watt

The EPYC 7F32 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2600X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 2600X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7F32 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600X and EPYC 7F32, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Ryzen 5 2600X
AMD EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2163 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600X or EPYC 7F32, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.