Xeon X7350 vs Ryzen 5 2600H
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 2600H outperforms Xeon X7350 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1460 | 1473 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.13 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 10.81 | 3.67 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) | Tigerton (2007) |
| Release date | 10 September 2018 (7 years ago) | 6 September 2007 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,301 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon X7350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 0.93 GHz |
| Multiplier | 32 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 4 MB (per die) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | 2x 143 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 64 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | 582 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon X7350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 4 |
| Socket | FP5 | PGA604,PPGA604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon X7350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon X7350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon X7350 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon X7350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR2, DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz) | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon X7350.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.54 | 4.45 |
| Recency | 10 September 2018 | 6 September 2007 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 130 Watt |
Ryzen 5 2600H has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 33.3% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 188.9% lower power consumption.
Xeon X7350, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Ryzen 5 2600H and Intel Xeon X7350.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 2600H is a notebook processor while Xeon X7350 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
