Xeon Bronze 3408U vs Ryzen 5 2600H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2600H
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
5.23
Xeon Bronze 3408U
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
6.24
+19.3%

Xeon Bronze 3408U outperforms Ryzen 5 2600H by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon Bronze 3408U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12091087
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data27.30
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency10.604.55
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date10 September 2018 (6 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$425

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon Bronze 3408U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.3 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.9 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache384 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)22.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon Bronze 3408U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon Bronze 3408U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon Bronze 3408U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon Bronze 3408U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon Bronze 3408U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-4000
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon Bronze 3408U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1280

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2600H 5.23
Xeon Bronze 3408U 6.24
+19.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2600H 8002
Xeon Bronze 3408U 9557
+19.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.23 6.24
Recency 10 September 2018 10 January 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen 5 2600H has 177.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3408U, on the other hand, has a 19.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 100% more physical cores.

The Xeon Bronze 3408U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2600H in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 2600H is a notebook processor while Xeon Bronze 3408U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600H and Xeon Bronze 3408U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
Ryzen 5 2600H
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U
Xeon Bronze 3408U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 11 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3408U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600H or Xeon Bronze 3408U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.