Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U vs Ryzen 5 2600E
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 2600E and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1067 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 39.39 |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Renoir PRO (Zen 2) (2020) |
| Release date | 10 September 2018 (6 years ago) | 7 May 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 2600E and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 31 | 25 |
| L1 cache | 576 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4800 Million | 9800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2600E and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4-4266 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 68.27 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 September 2018 | 7 May 2020 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 2600E has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 2600E and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 2600E is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600E and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
