Xeon Phi 7290 vs Ryzen 5 2600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.21
Xeon Phi 7290
2016
72 cores / 288 threads, 245 Watt
11.27
+37.3%

Xeon Phi 7290 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1000765
Place by popularity18not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.89no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency12.104.41
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)Knights Landing (2016)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon Phi 7290 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)72 (Doheptaconta-Core)
Threads12288
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache96K (per core)32 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,800 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon Phi 7290 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM43647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt245 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon Phi 7290. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon Phi 7290 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon Phi 7290 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon Phi 7290. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon Phi 7290.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 2600 8.21
Xeon Phi 7290 11.27
+37.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2600 13174
Xeon Phi 7290 18080
+37.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.21 11.27
Recency 19 April 2018 20 June 2016
Physical cores 6 72
Threads 12 288
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 245 Watt

Ryzen 5 2600 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 276.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Phi 7290, on the other hand, has a 37.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.

The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop processor while Xeon Phi 7290 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Xeon Phi 7290
Xeon Phi 7290

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 15798 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 41 vote

Rate Xeon Phi 7290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon Phi 7290, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.