Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 2600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.30
+42.4%
Xeon E5-2620 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
5.83

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v4 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E5-2620 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9161125
Place by popularity21not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.163.37
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Xeon E5
Power efficiency12.096.50
Architecture codenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$417

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 2600 has 201% better value for money than Xeon E5-2620 v4.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E5-2620 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s2 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3421
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache3 MB2 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)20 MB
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C74 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E5-2620 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E5-2620 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E5-2620 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E5-2620 v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E5-2620 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size128 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s68.3 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E5-2620 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2600 8.30
+42.4%
Xeon E5-2620 v4 5.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2600 13189
+42.4%
Xeon E5-2620 v4 9259

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 2600 1164
+37.8%
Xeon E5-2620 v4 845

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 2600 4900
+9.5%
Xeon E5-2620 v4 4474

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.30 5.83
Recency 19 April 2018 20 June 2016
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 85 Watt

Ryzen 5 2600 has a 42.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2620 v4, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

The Ryzen 5 2600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2620 v4 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2620 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon E5-2620 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
Xeon E5-2620 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15149 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 100 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600 or Xeon E5-2620 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.