Opteron 6238 vs Ryzen 5 2600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2600
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
7.48
+134%

Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Opteron 6238 by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11031742
Place by popularity18not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.540.34
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency4.861.18
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)Interlagos (2011−2012)
Release date19 April 2018 (7 years ago)14 November 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$455

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 2600 has 1824% better value for money than Opteron 6238.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600 and Opteron 6238 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache96K (per core)768 KB
L2 cache3 MB2 MB (per module)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography12 nm32 nm
Die size192 mm22x 315 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and Opteron 6238 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4
SocketAM4G34
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Opteron 6238. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Opteron 6238 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Opteron 6238. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Opteron 6238.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 2600 7.48
+134%
Opteron 6238 3.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2600 13151
+134%
Samples: 14339
Opteron 6238 5625
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.48 3.20
Recency 19 April 2018 14 November 2011
Physical cores 6 12
Chip lithography 12 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 115 Watt

Ryzen 5 2600 has a 133.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 76.9% lower power consumption.

Opteron 6238, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 6238 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop processor while Opteron 6238 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Opteron 6238
Opteron 6238

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 16382 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 6238 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 2600 and Opteron 6238, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.