5 320 vs Ryzen 5 2600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1166not rated
Place by popularity14not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.02no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency4.88no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)Wildcat Lake (2026)
Release date19 April 2018 (8 years ago)16 April 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$340

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2600 and Core 5 320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads126
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache96K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache3 MB2.5 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm3 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and Core 5 320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4Intel BGA 1516
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core 5 320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 2600 and Core 5 320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core 5 320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core 5 320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5, LPDDR5X
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core 5 320.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes206

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2600 13135
Samples: 15710
Core 5 320 15053
+14.6%
Samples: 3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2018 16 April 2026
Threads 12 6
Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 2600 has 100% more threads.

Core 5 320, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 333% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Core 5 320. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop processor while Core 5 320 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 16881 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 5 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 2600 and Core 5 320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.