Xeon Gold 5218T vs Ryzen 5 2500U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2500U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
3.68
Xeon Gold 5218T
2019, $1,561
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
12.15
+230%

Xeon Gold 5218T outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by a whopping 230% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1639703
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.77
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency10.424.92
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date26 October 2017 (8 years ago)2 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,561

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2500U and Xeon Gold 5218T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2021
L1 cache96 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size210 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data93 °C
Number of transistors4,950 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2500U and Xeon Gold 5218T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFP5FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Xeon Gold 5218T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 2500U and Xeon Gold 5218T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Xeon Gold 5218T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Xeon Gold 5218T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-2667
Maximum memory size32 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 8no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Xeon Gold 5218T.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1248

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 5 2500U 3.68
Xeon Gold 5218T 12.15
+230%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2500U 6492
Samples: 2818
Xeon Gold 5218T 21433
+230%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.68 12.15
Recency 26 October 2017 2 April 2019
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 32
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 105 Watt

Ryzen 5 2500U has 600% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5218T, on the other hand, has a 230.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Intel Xeon Gold 5218T is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 2500U is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5218T is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Ryzen 5 2500U
Intel Xeon Gold 5218T
Xeon Gold 5218T

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1236 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 5218T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 5 2500U and Xeon Gold 5218T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.