Ryzen 7 5800U vs Ryzen 5 2500U

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 5 2500U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads
4.24

Ryzen 7 5800U outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by a whopping 183% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2500U and Ryzen 7 5800U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1282584
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Cezanne-U (Zen 3)
Release date26 October 2017 (6 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$674 no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2500U and Ryzen 7 5800U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size246 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4500 Million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2500U and Ryzen 7 5800U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Ryzen 7 5800U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Ryzen 7 5800U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Ryzen 7 5800U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Ryzen 7 5800U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2500U 4.24
Ryzen 7 5800U 11.98
+183%

Ryzen 7 5800U outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by 183% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 2500U 6552
Ryzen 7 5800U 18523
+183%

Ryzen 7 5800U outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by 183% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 2500U 810
Ryzen 7 5800U 1669
+106%

Ryzen 7 5800U outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by 106% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 2500U 2331
Ryzen 7 5800U 6541
+181%

Ryzen 7 5800U outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by 181% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 2500U 4411
Ryzen 7 5800U 6039
+36.9%

Ryzen 7 5800U outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by 37% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 2500U 15684
Ryzen 7 5800U 26711
+70.3%

Ryzen 7 5800U outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by 70% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 5 2500U 10.23
Ryzen 7 5800U 4.11
+149%

Ryzen 5 2500U outperforms Ryzen 7 5800U by 149% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 2500U 7
Ryzen 7 5800U 15
+123%

Ryzen 7 5800U outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by 123% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 2500U 609
Ryzen 7 5800U 1613
+165%

Ryzen 7 5800U outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by 165% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 2500U 137
Ryzen 7 5800U 229
+67.2%

Ryzen 7 5800U outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by 67% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 2500U 1.59
Ryzen 7 5800U 2.7
+69.8%

Ryzen 7 5800U outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by 70% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 2500U 121
Ryzen 7 5800U 231
+90.5%

Ryzen 7 5800U outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by 90% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 2500U 35
Ryzen 7 5800U 81
+133%

Ryzen 7 5800U outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by 133% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.24 11.98
Integrated graphics card 4.49 9.07
Recency 26 October 2017 12 January 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

The Ryzen 7 5800U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2500U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2500U and Ryzen 7 5800U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Ryzen 5 2500U
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
Ryzen 7 5800U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1040 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 585 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2500U or Ryzen 7 5800U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.