EPYC 9634 vs Ryzen 5 2500U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 2500U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.11
EPYC 9634
2022
84 cores / 168 threads, 290 Watt
67.96
+1554%

EPYC 9634 outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by a whopping 1554% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 9634 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking140210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.11
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency25.9122.16
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date26 October 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,304

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 9634 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)84
Threads8168
Base clock speed2 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier2022.5
L1 cache128K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size246 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors4950 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 9634 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 9634. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 9634 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 9634. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 8no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 9634.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 2500U 4.11
EPYC 9634 67.96
+1554%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 2500U 6536
EPYC 9634 107944
+1552%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.11 67.96
Recency 26 October 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 4 84
Threads 8 168
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 290 Watt

Ryzen 5 2500U has 1833.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9634, on the other hand, has a 1553.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 2000% more physical cores and 2000% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9634 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2500U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 2500U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9634 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 9634, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Ryzen 5 2500U
AMD EPYC 9634
EPYC 9634

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1141 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9634 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2500U or EPYC 9634, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.