EPYC 7F32 vs Ryzen 5 2500U
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7F32 outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U by a whopping 258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1640 | 624 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.14 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 10.42 | 3.11 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 26 October 2017 (8 years ago) | 14 April 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 7F32 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | 37 |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 32 MB (per die) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | 4x 74 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | 15,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 7F32 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | FP5 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 7F32. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 7F32 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 7F32. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 8 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and EPYC 7F32.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.68 | 13.19 |
| Recency | 26 October 2017 | 14 April 2020 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 180 Watt |
Ryzen 5 2500U has 1100% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7F32, on the other hand, has a 258.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 7F32 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 2500U is a notebook processor while EPYC 7F32 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
