Celeron M 722 vs Ryzen 5 2500U
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1625 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 10.42 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 26 October 2017 (8 years ago) | 1 October 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 2500U and Celeron M 722 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2500U and Celeron M 722 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FP5 | VGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 5.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Celeron M 722. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Celeron M 722 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Celeron M 722. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 8 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Celeron M 722.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 26 October 2017 | 1 October 2008 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 5 Watt |
Ryzen 5 2500U has an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 722, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 5 2500U and Intel Celeron M 722. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
